Actually, no, I really appreciate your perspective, because I didn't see it that way at allTýsköll wrote: ↑Sun Jan 08, 2023 1:49 amShe didn't remove her clothes by choice though and even being there is presented as disrespectful.Caylus Ark wrote: ↑Sun Jan 08, 2023 12:44 amIt's funny, my perspective on it was the exact opposite. I always figured the injustice was the fact that after being so respectful and unclothing herself and presenting herself completely vulnerable before her sister and her sister's husband, it was cruel she received the treatment that she did.Týsköll wrote: ↑Sat Jan 07, 2023 11:04 pm
There's a lot in that story. How do you feel about Inanna learning a lesson regarding acting how you should when in places invited (or not), keeping with customs, "when in Rome", etc.
She seems to have learned a lesson in regards to this, though perhaps not about being truly just. Ereshkigal is praised at the end of the story apparently due to seeking justice, but what of her concession in allowing Inanna to leave. (3 days of darkness for Inanna before a resurrection btw).
Then, we have Inanna who returns home and meets out what seems a fairly harsh judgement in sending her lover in her places because he's not mourning her in the way of her people like others are. Is this hypocritical or is this having learned a lesson about how people should act as expected when in places with set rules, regulations and beliefs?
Was Inanna's punishment by Ereshkigal actually just? Or excessive?
Is this an alchemical process and/or ego death and rebirth?
Was Inanna hypocritical and "evil" in her reaction to her lover and putting him in her place, or was this part of lesson learned and seeking to teach same?
Remember, it is Ereshkigal who is praised at the end of the tale.
As I recall the sky god eventually gets pissed too.
But your take on it gives me stuff to think about
Neti does as he is commanded and, gate by gate, Inanna is stripped of her crown, beads, ring, sceptre, even her clothing and, when she asks the meaning of this indignity, is told by Neti:
In addition she's turned up unannounced, uninvited, to a place that has very strict rules and that it is known you don't get to leave again once entering."Quiet, Inanna, the ways of the underworld are perfect
They may not be questioned.
(Wolkstein and Kramer 58-60)"
It's quite a egotistical thing to presume she could just do that, isn't it? I think it is.
Different takes for sure, I'll have to have another read and make a point of taking her side as you're presenting it, to fully consider it.
Good, or Evil?
Honestly I think trying to apply duality like this is one of the biggest problems in the world, there are many shades between.
And I think that says something about me
![Monocle :monocle:](./images/smilies/1f9d0.png)
not in a bad or a good way, just that I was oblivious just like Inanna as to why Erishkegal got so mad
actually this goes back to my dnd alignment thing about how it's less about whether you fall on the good or evil spectrum and more if you fall on the chaotic, ordered, or neutral spectrum